A dismissed lawsuit and a cheeky promo have reopened the age-old question: Are boneless chicken wings really ‘wings’?
A federal judge ruled that Buffalo Wild Wings can keep "boneless wings" on its menu. Now, we want your vote. Can wings be ...
The judge said in his ruling that Aimen Halim did not "drum" up enough evidence in his lawsuit arguing the "boneless wings" ...
An Illinois judge’s written opinion sided with Buffalo Wild Wings, but it’s far from the final word.
A Chicago man filed a lawsuit in 2023 against Buffalo Wild Wings, arguing that it had engaged in false advertising of its boneless wings. A judge said the claim “has no meat on its bones.” ...
A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by an Illinois man who alleged that Buffalo Wild Wings' use of the term "boneless wings" was deceptive.
A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit claiming Buffalo Wild Wings falsely advertised its boneless wings, ruling that reasonable ...
Judge John Tharp Jr. ruled agaisnt Aimen Halim's claims that the use of the term “boneless wings” was deceptive.
A boneless chicken wing with bones is still a boneless chicken, according to an Ohio court. A man who ate boneless wings in 2016 sued an Ohio restaurant after ingesting a two-inch bone that tore his ...
Despite his best efforts, Halim did not ‘drum’ up enough factual allegations to state a claim," the judge wrote.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results